Closed hmazter closed 2 years ago
Hi, @hmazter!
Looks like the reason for the "0..2" cardinality in PEPPOL BIS is to accommodate for both VAT identifier (BT-31) and tax registration identifier (BT-32).
I've pushed the commit 30751aa5e9bc85cc92b8406cdb9980c0cd7d0db7 to add this functionality.
Thanks! I will try it out
Hi!
According to https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/syntax/ubl-invoice/cac-AccountingSupplierParty/cac-Party/cac-PartyTaxScheme/ allows up to 2 instances of PartyTaxScheme on the AccountingSupplierParty.
And we are in need of using both those instances to accomplish this output:
What could be a good approach to add that functionality? I can open a PR, but wanted to ask for directions first.