Closed mreininghaus closed 6 years ago
This is going to be Biber-only, but I agree it sounds reasonable (sorry it's taken so long to look at it!). I'll see what I can do.
Thank you for finally spending efforts on this! Unfortunately, your solution doesn't seem to work just out of the box. The style always takes the "field-undef'ed" branch, regardless of the presence of the collaboration field. From what I read up in the biblatex documentation and stackexchange, it seems to be necessary to modify the data model of biblatex in order to add custom fields.
It would be nice to have the collaboration field included to produce an output like
[7] K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 032002 (2013)
from a .bib file entry with a
collaboration = {T2K Collaboration}
line. This conforms to the instructions given in the Physical Review Style and Notation Guide (p. 7) by the APS.