Closed jacekkopecky closed 9 years ago
I vote for use the existing key bindings rather than override with these extra complex ones.
@wolftune ah, right - I meant use the existing Atom key bindings but override their default action with the functionality from multi-cursor Is that what you mean too?
@jacekkopecky yes, except that in the cases where the actions are the same, obviously there's nothing to override.
Ah but you are mistaken sir, the actions aren't quite the same. :smile:
multi-cursor's adding of selections can also remove selections (try going up and then down - Atom will keep adding, multi-cursor allows you to correct the selections when you've overdone it).
ah nice, but yes, it should just replace the existing keybinding, not use a new additional more complex one.
Overriding those commands sounds good to me, I wasn't aware of those commands by atom, this would be resolved just by changing the default keybindings to the atom's keybindings?
I think so, yes, it means one less key to deal with. Potentially, the four-modifier options could then be switched to three.
Fixed by #13
I just became aware that Atom has its own commands,
editor:add-selection-above
and...-below
with key bindings different from multi-cursor's. Perhaps this package could use/override the default key bindings from Atom?