On version 2.8.0, it seems a S-Block is interpreted as I-Block when receiving from an I-Block
On the oppositive way, when receiving an I-Block after a S-Block, it's not interpreted.
No problem on main listing, but protocol decoding seems to be incorrect.
Hello,
On version 2.8.0, it seems a
S-Block
is interpreted asI-Block
when receiving from anI-Block
On the oppositive way, when receiving anI-Block
after aS-Block
, it's not interpreted.No problem on main listing, but protocol decoding seems to be incorrect.