Closed epaillas closed 1 year ago
Hi,
It's hard to tell. given that nowhere in the dynesty code 'log_evidence' term/variable is used. But if you have log-likelihood, uou should be able to to compute the log-posterior by adding log-prior to it. (it is not saved explicitely in dynesty, so you'll need to compute logprior yourself)
Hi, thanks for the reply. According to https://dynesty.readthedocs.io/en/stable/quickstart.html, the dictionary containing the full set of quantities from the sampling results includes:
which should correspond to the log_evidence and log_evidence_err columns in my files. I was wondering if this would have to be included in the determination of the log posterior. If it's just an overall normalization factor, I guess it shouldn't impact the MAP, so I'll go ahead and try to compute the log posterior from the likelihood and prior.
The logz will not help you determine the MAP value according to my understanding (as this is cumulative evidence up to that point). I think the only choice I can see is to take logl values and add to them logprior values that you will need to compute.
Hi, apologies for the basic question, but I'm working with some dynesty chains that include the following columns:
log_likelihood, log_weights, log_evidence, log_evidence_err, param1, param2...
I'm interested in calculating the maximum a posteriory probability for each chain. Some parameter priors are Gaussian, others are uniform.
This is my first time working with dynesty so I'm a bit lost. I don't see a column explicitly recording the log posterior, so I'm guessing it can be derived from the other columns? What's the best way to approach this?