Open joshuan98 opened 1 year ago
This snippet is meant to be a sample response, not a reference of the actual response, thus is not important if it is partially cut off.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Unable to view full code
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
Similar to the ug, for the dg, there are some commands that exceed the view space of the pdf
[original: nus-cs2113-AY2223S1/pe-interim#166] [original labels: severity.VeryLow type.DocumentationBug]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Code is shown as a sample and not as a reference, therefore it is not important that part of it is cut off.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: Similar to the duplicate issue,
I disagree with the group's claim that simply because it is not important and hence it is okay for part of it to be cut off. By that same line of reasoning, if it is not important, then it should not even be in the UG and DG. The very fact that the group chose to insert it means that there is some rationale behind including it.
Personally, our own PE had a similar issue and we accepted the issue as very low because it is a cosmetic issue.
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Code messages are cut off in the pdf