Closed AWolf81 closed 5 years ago
Merging #373 into master will increase coverage by
0.87%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #373 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 57.27% 58.14% +0.87%
==========================================
Files 158 158
Lines 3314 3314
Branches 459 459
==========================================
+ Hits 1898 1927 +29
+ Misses 1207 1184 -23
+ Partials 209 203 -6
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/services/create-project.service.js | 95.55% <100%> (+64.44%) |
:arrow_up: |
Thanks for the changes.
Why is a change of let DISABLE=false
not possible? Is it because it's creating a new reference for every new value? Maybe I have to play with this a bit in a Codesandbox.
With the object literal it is working because the reference to DISABLE constant will be the same for every modification of the literal, right?
function(...args)
is more readable and OK to use.
I have one point I'd like to know what you think - see inline comment that I added. After that I think it can be merged.
Yeah, booleans are passed by value while objects are passed by reference. Here's a quick demo:
let bool = false;
let obj = { prop: false };
function mutateByValue(a) {
// a is a copy of the passed value, so mutations aren't persisted outside this block scope
a = true;
}
function mutateByReference(a) {
// a is a reference to the passed value, so mutations modify the original object directly
// changes are persisted outside this block scope
a.prop = true;
}
mutateByValue(bool);
console.log(bool); // false
mutateByReference(obj);
console.log(obj.prop); // true
Summary: Added tests for project creation service.