[SUBMISSION] The illusory promise of the Aligned Rank Transform

[statransform]

Title

The illusory promise of the Aligned Rank Transform - A systematic study of rank transformations

Required sections

• [X] Abstract
• [X] A navigational aid, such as a table of contents, links or buttons between sections, or an option to switch between paper-mode and interactive mode (for more interactive/experimental articles). Some articles (e.g,. narrative visualization) might lend themselves to be progressively disclosed without an overview.
• [x] Research materials
• [X] Authorship statement (leave a placeholder if submitting anonymously)
• [X] License (CC-BY or CC-BY-SA).
• [X] Conflicts of Interest

Desired URL stub

2024-tsandilas-ranktransforms

Technical checklist

• [X] The <title> tag of my page contains the title of my article
• [X] The article contains an infobox indicating it is under review at JoVI
• [X] I have replaced 20XX-REPO-NAME in the links in the infobox with my desired URL stub.

Source repository URL

https://github.com/statransform/jovi/

Github Pages setup

• [X] I have set up Github Pages

Live paper URL

https://statransform.github.io/jovi/

Article format

Quarto

Article format details

Supplementary materials are part of the Github repository, so we expect that they can be cloned together with all the project. Notice, however, that our links to supplementary materials in the paper point to the original Github repository to ensure that they are appropriately linked and viewed.

Authors

Theophanis Tsandilas, theophanis.tsandilas@inria.fr, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Inria, LISN Géry Casiez, gery.casiez@univ-lille.fr, Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inria, Centrale Lille, UMR 9189 CRIStAL

Github IDs

Theophanis Tsandilas: ephanis Géry Casiez: casiez

Conflicts

Advisory board

• Pierre Dragicevic
• Yvonne Jansen

Associate Editors

• Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose
• James Eagan

Note: Matthew Kay is a natural reviewer of the submission. Although he is actively involved in administering the experimental track of JoVI, we do not see any conflict and would like him to review our paper.

[statransform]

The submission process does not allow us to include confidential comments or requests, which is unfortunate. The fact that all submission information is public should be more clearly stated.

[floe]

Dear colleagues, thank you for your submission! It seems this slipped under the radar due to holiday season, apologies, we will be getting back to you ASAP. /cc @mjskay @chatchavan @lonnibesancon

[statransform]

Dear organizing committee (@floe @mjskay @chatchavan @lonnibesancon), As we don't have news regarding the progress of our submission (> 3 months), we are becoming concerned. The suggested review timeline (https://www.journalovi.org/submit.html#reviewing-timeline) does not seem to be up to date. Is the journal's reviewing process postponed after CHI's reviewing deadlines?