soc-pe-bot
commented
2 months ago Team's Response
We think that the best way to implement find is to search with "starts with". Because "contains" would be too vague and broad. eg: find e/o would return emails like ronald@gmail.com elliot@someone.com (basically anything with .com) which is not very useful. This behaviour is not expected
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
## :question: Issue type Team chose [`type.FunctionalityBug`] Originally [`type.FeatureFlaw`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]
List of Clients:
As Per the UG, there is no specific instructions on how the find command works for the email parameter. However, for the name and phone prefixes, it matches for any instances of the search.
As such, it's expected that searching for email would work the same as well. However this is not the case
Actual:
Expected: List of Clients whose email contains example.com
UG specifications for name and phone prefixes, it matches clients based on whether they contain the keyword, not starts with