Closed developer0hye closed 1 year ago
Hi, oh my, you're right thank you for catching us! Will be fixed in the next revision!
It turns out Table 6 currently reports AP,AP50,AP75,APs instead of AP,APs,APm,APl. Thanks again for catching this.
Revised table below.
First | Second | AP | APs | APm | APl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 43.2 | 25.9 | 46.6 | 57.6 |
1 | 2 | 44.7 | 26.8 | 47.6 | 59.8 |
1 | 4 | 45.1 | 27.1 | 48.0 | 60.4 |
1 | 8 | 43.0 | 24.5 | 46.3 | 59.2 |
2 | 1 | 44.0 | 27.7 | 46.7 | 58.3 |
4 | 1 | 43.7 | 25.6 | 47.0 | 57.9 |
8 | 1 | 43.1 | 26.4 | 46.7 | 56.4 |
2 | 2 | 45.4 | 28.6 | 48.5 | 60.1 |
4 | 4 | 45.8 | 28.4 | 48.4 | 60.7 |
@jozhang97 Thanks again for sharing your work!
@jozhang97 Thanks for sharing your work!
It seems that APs in the table 6. is so high. I think that the order of values in APL and APs should be changed.