Open MauScheff opened 7 years ago
Merging #389 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #389 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.67% 90.67%
=======================================
Files 14 14
Lines 847 847
Branches 29 29
=======================================
Hits 768 768
Misses 66 66
Partials 13 13
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
#codecov | 90.67% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#dj110 | 87.48% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#dj111 | 87.48% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#dj18 | 89.84% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#dj19 | 89.84% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#drf31 | 89.84% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#drf32 | 89.84% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#drf33 | 89.84% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#drf34 | 90.67% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#drf35 | 90.31% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#drf36 | 90.31% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#py27 | 90.67% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#py33 | 89.49% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
#py34 | 89.49% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0a0bd40...1300b5d. Read the comment docs.
Reminded me of https://github.com/GetBlimp/django-rest-framework-jwt/pull/370.
Maybe we should have an explit test to cover this use case?
Added JWT_PAYLOAD_HANDLER usage example to the docs. https://github.com/GetBlimp/django-rest-framework-jwt/issues/367#issuecomment-334878640
@blueyed