Closed blackwinter closed 10 years ago
Holy crap, this is awesome. Would you be interested in becoming the new maintainer of the repo? (I'm serious.)
Oh well... ;) While I do appreciate the thought, I'm actually torn. I'd love for this project to be actively developed again. It definitely deserves more attention (don't get me wrong, your efforts are absolutely commendable; it's just that there's still a lot to do, I'm sure you'll agree). However, I've only been using this library for one Semantic MediaWiki project, which is almost finished now. I honestly don't know if I can make time for it in the future.
Long story short, I'd prefer to join you as a collaborator on this repo and maybe as a co-owner of the gem. This way I could lend a hand in maintaining the project and cutting new releases as needed. And who knows, maybe even contribute in a more substantial way if time permits. But a new official maintainer should probably be more involved and able to invest a bigger slice of their time.
Understood, but I'd much prefer to have you on board on a best-effort basis than not at all, so I've added you as a collaborator. Please let me know your e-mail, so I can add you as a gem owner. And thanks again!
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jens Wille notifications@github.com wrote:
Oh well... ;) While I do appreciate the thought, I'm actually torn. I'd love for this project to be actively developed again. It definitely deserves more attention (don't get me wrong, your efforts are absolutely commendable; it's just that there's still a lot to do, I'm sure you'll agree). However, I've only been using this library for one Semantic MediaWiki project, which is almost finished now. I honestly don't know if I can make time for it in the future.
Long story short, I'd prefer to join you as a collaborator on this repo and maybe as a co-owner of the gem. This way I could lend a hand in maintaining the project and cutting new releases as needed. And who knows, maybe even contribute in a more substantial way if time permits. But a new official maintainer should probably be more involved and able to invest a bigger slice of their time.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jpatokal/mediawiki-gateway/pull/68#issuecomment-57136270 .
Thank you :) You can use ww@blackwinter.de (also in my profile).
Thanks, added. Try creating a 0.6.2 release? You'll need to bump up the VERSION file, ber gemspec, ber git:release, then build and push the gem.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Jens Wille notifications@github.com wrote:
Thank you :) You can use ww@blackwinter.de (also in my profile).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jpatokal/mediawiki-gateway/pull/68#issuecomment-57154146 .
Done. I assume it's safe to use rake
instead of ber
, whatever that is ;)
Oh, wait, I know. alias ber='bundle exec rake'
, right?
Oops, yup, sorry!
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Jens Wille notifications@github.com wrote:
Oh, wait, I know. alias ber='bundle exec rake', right?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jpatokal/mediawiki-gateway/pull/68#issuecomment-57158363 .
In order to verify actual API usage, FakeMediaWiki is not sufficient. Testing against live MediaWiki installations provided by Docker should give a lot more confidence and even allows to easily test different versions.
Requires Docker and mediawiki-testwiki; live tests are skipped when
mediawiki-testwiki
is not available. Docker images for various MediaWiki versions are available on the Docker Hub Registry.Status:
gateway_spec.rb
have been ported.required_version
).Result: