Closed uliska closed 6 years ago
I think this one could be considered as done. Would someone have big enough sources to check it ?
The only real caveat I've got in mind is that \begin{lilypond}
has to be written \begin{lilypond}[]
.
I suggest you write to the lilypond-user list and ask people to check it out and test existing real-world files.
Regarding the empty options issue I suggest to provide a script that automatically inserts empty options if necessary. At first I thought this was strange but actually this could even be implemented as a command in lyluatex
, so compiling a file with
\usepackage{lyluatex}
\begin{document}
\convertlytex{path/to/lilypond-book-file}
\end{document}
would parse and update that file. It could also be given a directory and an extension to batch-process them.
So we agree that this is fully completed, but we should ask specifically for this point when asking for testing.
Just pushed a note about that in the doc, but otherwise OK.
@jperon I think we can close this issue now. From our side compatibility is provided, and I think that instead of keeping this issue open we can just wait if others report new issues.
This basically is a place-holder issue for the lilypond-book project.
I don't want to duplicate that project as a check box list here, but it's a way to keep a reference in the Release v1 milestone