Closed uliska closed 6 years ago
See also the last comments to #54
As far as I can see the problem is that my approach forces some stretchability
values in the flexible vertical paper spacing alists to 0
. It seems this badly affects how these properties behave with general layout calculations.
For the time being I think we'll have to accept that we can't really solve the issue, although I think there may be ways to make LilyPond produce good results nevertheless.
I would like to keep the option but make it optional (reverse defaults) and document it as experimental.
It seems the paper layout techniques used with the fullpagealign=staffline option disturb LilyPond's spacing algorithms: it can happen that Lily tries to squeeze more systems in the page than would be good.
I'll have to investigate this further.