Hello there, I noticed that the in_reply_to_tweet_id method of the TweetBuilder struct accepts a user_id parameter rather than a tweet_id as the name of the method would suggest. Is this intentional, or does it actually accept a user_id meaning that the method could be renamed to in_reply_to_user_id?
Hello there, I noticed that the
in_reply_to_tweet_id
method of theTweetBuilder
struct accepts auser_id
parameter rather than atweet_id
as the name of the method would suggest. Is this intentional, or does it actually accept auser_id
meaning that the method could be renamed toin_reply_to_user_id
?