Closed chenyu-lii closed 1 month ago
Hi @chenyu-lii,
The full algorithm is described in the Cox et al. (2020) paper. There is no exclusion of windows, the only issue may be if the HVSR does not have a peak. It’s hard to say what the issue is, without more information. Can you share some examples of what you mean?
Thanks for your reply! Here are some examples.
Probably it's because the HVSR didn't have a clear peak?
Hi @chenyu-lii, You could try selecting only the lower peak by changing the line below, which can be found in
search_range_in_hz = (None, None)
Change the second None to be 3, so:
search_range_in_hz = (None, 3)
This is the high cutoff for the search range, and will stop the algorithm looking at any of the peaks above 3 Hz. You may still have issues though because the lower frequency peak has a broad range of peaks around it. I can see that the rejection algorithm is working in the second image though because the is one peak at about 0.7 Hz that is red.
Thanks for your suggestions. I could see an improvement after setting the search_range_in_hz = (None, 3).
Here is an example after changing the search range:
The HVSR before looks like this:
Thank you so much again!
Hello!
My name is Chenyu, and I am using hvsrpy to compute HVSR curves for my dataset. Thanks for this great open package.
I applied this script to my data: example_mhvsr_traditional_window_rejection.ipynb. I tried to read in multiple mseed files, and it works well for some stations. Unfortunately, for a few other stations, the window rejection seems not working, they didn't reject any curves, and the error seems quite large. The parameter is always n=2.
I was wondering if there are any reasons for not rejecting windows, such as the waveforms or HVSR curves are too noisy?
Thank you so much for your time!
Regards, Chenyu