codecov[bot]
commented
4 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 95.31%. Comparing base (
75a34ef) to head (950a4b1). Report is 3 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #272 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 95.41% 95.31% -0.10% ========================================== Files 9 9 Lines 1025 1025 Branches 216 216 ========================================== - Hits 978 977 -1 - Misses 43 44 +1 Partials 4 4 ```:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I noticed after the last PR that a CodeCov report hadn't been generated. It looks like they haven't worked for a few months. It seems they are now requiring a token where previously it was optional. I also added the option to fail if codecov fails, which used to happen when we used the cli directly, but is disabled by default with the codecov action.
I also tried to update the action to V4, but that failed for 2.7 because the action (both V3 and V4) use a PyInstaller wrapped binary of the codecov-cli and one of the subcommands used in V4 is looking for a slightly newer version of glibc than the docker image for 2.7 provides. https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/issues/1277