Closed ZuBB closed 2 years ago
Ok, I got it. its a valid case. but what about 2nd thing
In the latest versions classnames package goes with its own version of types and it creates some confusion
?
ah if they started including types then yeah we should remove the DT types
had to say that I have found a workaround on my side how to overcome, so it is up to you what to do in this case (I realized it is not so easy as I thought)
in any case thanks for good support in a very timely manner
Can you explain what was the motivation to add '@types/classnames' as a runtime dependency for a 'react-widgets' package?
if you need types for that package -- that dependency has to be moved to "devDependecies" section.
In the latest versions classnames package goes with its own version of types and it creates some confusion
Do I miss something?
source commit https://github.com/jquense/react-widgets/commit/a02861767ea3f758837b2dedaa24e087e8e96d5c