jreed-Aces / note-taker

0 stars 0 forks source link

Sweep: Create initial unit tests for the NoteService class #46

Open jreed-Aces opened 1 year ago

jreed-Aces commented 1 year ago

Create a new C# project that will contain unit tests. This project will use xunit and the FakeItEasy library for mocking. Create unit tests for all methods in the NoteService class. This should mock all references to IFileService, and verify that all calls to the IFileService were called correctly.

Fill out all unit tests with proper test code. Do not use placeholders.

Checklist - [X] `note-taker.Tests/NoteServiceTests.cs` > • Create a new class named NoteServiceTests. > • Add using directives for xunit, FakeItEasy, and the namespaces of the NoteService and IFileService classes. > • Create a private readonly field of type IFileService and initialize it with a FakeItEasy mock. > • Create a private readonly field of type NoteService and initialize it with a new instance of NoteService, passing the mock IFileService to its constructor. > • For each method in the NoteService class, create a corresponding test method. Each test method should arrange the necessary conditions for the test, act by calling the method under test, and assert that the expected results have been achieved.
sweep-ai[bot] commented 1 year ago

Here's the PR! https://github.com/jreed-Aces/note-taker/pull/47.

⚡ Sweep Free Trial: I used GPT-3.5 to create this ticket. You have 3 GPT-4 tickets left for the month and 0 for the day. For more GPT-4 tickets, visit our payment portal. To retrigger Sweep, edit the issue.


Step 1: 🔍 Code Search

I found the following snippets in your repository. I will now analyze these snippets and come up with a plan.

Some code snippets I looked at (click to expand). If some file is missing from here, you can mention the path in the ticket description. https://github.com/jreed-Aces/note-taker/blob/d5065e9932eb35dfea6bd13544ce1b22be7c6f92/note-taker.Tests/note-taker.Tests.csproj#L1-L31 https://github.com/jreed-Aces/note-taker/blob/d5065e9932eb35dfea6bd13544ce1b22be7c6f92/README.md#L1-L24 https://github.com/jreed-Aces/note-taker/blob/d5065e9932eb35dfea6bd13544ce1b22be7c6f92/note-taker/note-taker.csproj#L1-L18 https://github.com/jreed-Aces/note-taker/blob/d5065e9932eb35dfea6bd13544ce1b22be7c6f92/note-taker.sln#L1-L28 https://github.com/jreed-Aces/note-taker/blob/d5065e9932eb35dfea6bd13544ce1b22be7c6f92/sweep.yaml#L1-L12

Step 2: 🧐 Snippet Analysis

From looking through the relevant snippets, I decided to make the following modifications:

File Path Proposed Changes
note-taker.Tests/NoteServiceTests.cs Create note-taker.Tests/NoteServiceTests.cs with contents:
• Create a new class named NoteServiceTests.
• Add using directives for xunit, FakeItEasy, and the namespaces of the NoteService and IFileService classes.
• Create a private readonly field of type IFileService and initialize it with a FakeItEasy mock.
• Create a private readonly field of type NoteService and initialize it with a new instance of NoteService, passing the mock IFileService to its constructor.
• For each method in the NoteService class, create a corresponding test method. Each test method should arrange the necessary conditions for the test, act by calling the method under test, and assert that the expected results have been achieved.

Step 3: 📝 Planning

I have created a plan for writing the pull request. I am now working my plan and coding the required changes to address this issue. Here is the planned pull request:

Add unit tests for NoteService class sweep/add-unit-tests

Description

This PR adds unit tests for all methods in the NoteService class in the note-taker project. The tests are written using xunit as the testing framework and FakeItEasy for mocking the IFileService dependency. Each test method arranges the necessary conditions, acts by calling the method under test, and asserts that the expected results have been achieved.

Summary of Changes

  • Created a new test class named NoteServiceTests in the note-taker.Tests project.
  • Added using directives for xunit, FakeItEasy, and the namespaces of the NoteService and IFileService classes.
  • Created a private readonly field of type IFileService and initialized it with a FakeItEasy mock.
  • Created a private readonly field of type NoteService and initialized it with a new instance of NoteService, passing the mock IFileService to its constructor.
  • Added test methods for each method in the NoteService class. Each test method arranges the necessary conditions, acts by calling the method under test, and asserts that the expected results have been achieved.

Step 4: ⌨️ Coding

File Instructions Progress
note-taker.Tests/NoteServiceTests.cs Create note-taker.Tests/NoteServiceTests.cs with contents:
• Create a new class named NoteServiceTests.
• Add using directives for xunit, FakeItEasy, and the namespaces of the NoteService and IFileService classes.
• Create a private readonly field of type IFileService and initialize it with a FakeItEasy mock.
• Create a private readonly field of type NoteService and initialize it with a new instance of NoteService, passing the mock IFileService to its constructor.
• For each method in the NoteService class, create a corresponding test method. Each test method should arrange the necessary conditions for the test, act by calling the method under test, and assert that the expected results have been achieved.
✅ Commit d5065e9 I have finished coding the issue. I am now reviewing it for completeness.

Step 5: 🔁 Code Review

Here are my self-reviews of my changes at sweep/add-unit-tests_4.

I finished incorporating these changes.


🎉 Latest improvements to Sweep:


💡 To recreate the pull request edit the issue title or description. Join Our Discord

kevinlu1248 commented 1 year ago

@jreed-Aces I'm a developer of Sweep and noticed you've been closing a lot of these PRs of unit tests: I'm wondering why they haven't been working for you. Thanks!

jreed-Aces commented 1 year ago

@kevinlu1248 I'm working on doing some viability testing to see if Sweep is something we would want to pursue. Opening/closing the PRs is testing slightly different situations with the code and prompting. There's no direct issue, it's more just getting data for comparison. Thanks for checking in!

kevinlu1248 commented 1 year ago

@jreed-Aces Looks like you ran out of GPT-4 issues so I reset your issue count so you can get better data for testing.