Closed Jesus closed 9 years ago
I think the current behavior involves raising an ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound from DelayedPaperclip.process_job when the job is trying to fetch the originating object.
But maybe the job should be deleted when its parent object is deleted?
@Jesus This issue is a duplicate of https://github.com/jrgifford/delayed_paperclip/issues/101
I hadn't seen it, thanks.
Btw, thanks for your contribution!
I think the current behavior involves raising an ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound from DelayedPaperclip.process_job when the job is trying to fetch the originating object.
But maybe the job should be deleted when its parent object is deleted?