search

jrgifford / delayed_paperclip

Process your Paperclip attachments in the background with delayed_job or Resque.
http://www.jstorimer.com/ruby/2010/01/30/delayed-paperclip.html
MIT License
402 stars 155 forks source link

Help testing against edge resque #20

Closed steveklabnik closed 8 years ago

steveklabnik commented 11 years ago

Hey there!

I'm gearing up to work on Resque 2.0, and I'd like to coordinate better with plugin authors to make sure stuff doesn't break.

I'd like to know a few things:

  1. Can I do something to help get you testing against edge Resque?
  2. Are you monkey-patching anything in Resque currently? Can 2.0 expose an API to help you not have to do that any more?
  3. Do you need any help in bringing your plugin up-to-date with the latest Resque?

Thanks!

Related: https://github.com/resque/resque/issues/880

jrgifford commented 11 years ago
  1. Not sure, I'll be looking into this soon.
  2. Don't think so. I'll check.
  3. I'll have to try with latest first, then get back to you. :-)
jrgifford commented 11 years ago

Are there tips on getting around the conflict of older versions of rails relying on specific versions of thor, and on resque 2.0 requiring a specific version of thor? I've hit a wall on this.

steveklabnik commented 11 years ago

This is the first I've heard about the issue. I'm willing to relax the Thor dependency on 2.0 if this is causing problems.

jrgifford commented 11 years ago

When I get home, I'll post the more detailed stuff I've found as well as the exact message I'm getting.

James Gifford P: 216-223-8574 Snowy Penguin Solutions, LLC | https://snowypenguinsolutions.com

On Apr 25, 2013, at 13:38, Steve Klabnik notifications@github.com wrote:

This is the first I've heard about the issue. I'm willing to relax the Thor dependency on 2.0 if this is causing problems.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

morgoth commented 8 years ago

As the direction is to support only ActiveJob, it won't happen - follow discussion on #173