Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
In fact you'd like to have an autobatch mode with a loop possibility for the
cli
frontend? This should not be too hard to implement. Any idea how the options
should
be named or behave?
Something like ./rrip_cli --batchmode --loop --devices=/dev/cdrom0,/dev/cdrom1 ?
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 28 Nov 2007 at 6:21
These by cli are well named, I am happy. Let us hack this in and we can do some
testing. I will be in direct contact. Improvement for checking, etc etc ... is
later
possible.
Original comment by fberc...@xs4all.nl
on 28 Nov 2007 at 9:32
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Check1: The --batchmode can not be set without using --devices=
Idea: --batchmode-devices=
Check2: The --loop will only run if there is a batch set.
Original comment by fberc...@xs4all.nl
on 28 Nov 2007 at 10:06
I think what one would really want is the ability to rip multiple cds in
parallel!
So you just put two cds in and it does both at the same tmie, then pops them
out
when done, and lets you put in new ones as soon as each one is popped out
(doesn't
have to wait for both.)
Original comment by samsli...@gmail.com
on 5 Dec 2007 at 3:56
With the SATA interfaces these days, this would indeed offer some advantage.
Perhaps I'll get it in the user interface too. It will take some time, but I'll
implement it sooner or later. However, I don't think this should have top
priority.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 31 Dec 2007 at 6:19
Issue 314 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 24 Jun 2009 at 6:02
The temp dir is made unique with the freedb id number. Only drawback is that
when you
disable freedb this solution won't work.
Can anyone test if ripping with two instances of rubyripper open (with each
configured it's own drive) acts now as expected? At least one drive should have
a
SATA connection. Multiple cores for the cpu are also recommended (if you want
improved speed).
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2009 at 5:18
This is fixed as reported in issue 314.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 11 Jul 2009 at 8:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fberc...@xs4all.nl
on 26 Nov 2007 at 10:45