Closed albertogg closed 8 years ago
@albertogg Thanks for doing this! Just a couple of minor comments.
@cpuguy83, done!
What about the other images? and the dir structure?
@albertogg If you're up for it I'll take it. Thanks!
@cpuguy83 sure I can, I was thinking on doing jruby 9k in this pull request and open another for 1.7. I just don't know what would be the correct or desired dir structure.
Currently there's this:
tree .
.
├── 1.7
│ ├── jdk
│ │ └── Dockerfile
│ ├── jre
│ │ └── Dockerfile
│ └── onbuild
│ └── Dockerfile
├── 9000
│ ├── alpine
│ │ └── Dockerfile
│ ├── jdk
│ │ └── Dockerfile
│ ├── jre
│ │ └── Dockerfile
│ └── onbuild
│ └── Dockerfile
└── LICENSE.md
What I'm not sure of is if I should rename the 9000/alpine
dir to 9000/alpine-jre
and so on. What's you take on this?
alpine-jre and alpine-jdk are good (assuming there is an alpine:jdk-1.8)
yes, both jre and jdk images are available! let me go for it then, thanks
done with both jruby 9k images jdk and jre.
Sorry, 2 more comments, and can you squash to 1 commit?
done!
Hi, I just want to ask what's the status of this? Sorry if I'm being annoying.
Sorry, just tested. LGTM.
Thanks! Image is about 1/2 the size of the debian based one. Good job!
Thanks! 🎊
PR to update official images: docker-library/official-images#1920
Hi, I notice the repo is missing the alpine image and that #9 was a bit outdated but that was something wanted. I decided to work in this a bit and did the alpine image for jruby 9k using JRE base image as a starting point. I could work in the others if needed but, I have a few questions:
1) Do you guys think that JDK, JRE and on-build images will be needed? 2) Depending in answer 1 what would be the desired folder structure?
Thanks,