Closed deivid-rodriguez closed 2 years ago
Ok, I can repro test failures now, will work on this.
I built https://github.com/takari/polyglot-maven/pull/236 locally with the idea of using it here to see if that fixes the CI, but got the following error:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal de.saumya.mojo:gem-maven-plugin:2.0.0-1:initialize (default) on project polyglot-ruby: Execution default of goal de.saumya.mojo:gem-maven-plugin:2.0.0-1:initialize failed: Unable to load the mojo 'initialize' in the plugin 'de.saumya.mojo:gem-maven-plugin:2.0.0-1' due to an API incompatibility: org.codehaus.plexus.component.repository.exception.ComponentLookupException: de/saumya/mojo/gem/InitializeMojo has been compiled by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this version of the Java Runtime only recognizes class file versions up to 52.0
Could it be that gem-maven-plugin:2.0.0-1
has actually dropped support for Java 8 while adding support for Java 11? Does that make sense?
@deivid-rodriguez that is actually correct - seems that the parent (for gem-maven-plugin) is compiling with 11 (not sure why)
It was because of an incorrect change I made that somehow sneaked into the 2.0.0 release. I think it was just an oversight. I was just working on a WIP PR on adding Java 11 support but didn't intend to drop support for java 8 at all. Hopefully we can get the changes in https://github.com/torquebox/jruby-maven-plugins/pull/119 released to get support for Java 8 restored!
jruby-maven-plugins 2.0.1
was released and I updated https://github.com/takari/polyglot-maven/pull/236 to use it, but even using a locally built polyglot-ruby
using that, old dependencies are still being pulled and I'm unsure why. In particular,mavengem-wagon 0.2.1, which brings gem-maven-plugins 1.1.5, which we want to avoid. 🤔
I'm pretty sure it's coming from here: https://github.com/torquebox/maven-tools/blob/b52405ed1bb73fec626c631a18ea40045d6b6816/lib/maven/tools/versions.rb#L27-L32.
We most likely also need to bump those dependencies, get a new version out, and then bump polyglot-ruby
dependency on it as well.
I created another PR for maven-tools: https://github.com/torquebox/maven-tools/pull/34. That one was tricky because building maven-tools
locally was using the broken latest release of maven-tools
. To fix this chicken-and-egg issue, I migrated maven-tools
to use a plain pom.xml
file instead of a Mavenfile
.
I will verify it later, but I think now once https://github.com/takari/polyglot-maven/pull/237 is merged and released and we bump the polyglot-ruby
dependency here, we'll have a green CI.
It tested locally against a locally built version of polyglot-ruby
including https://github.com/takari/polyglot-maven/pull/237, and it's all green 🎉.
So we just need to wait for https://github.com/takari/polyglot-maven/pull/237 to be released.
polyglot-ruby 0.4.8 has been released and I updated ruby-maven
to use it, but now CI fails sometimes and passes others. I'll try figure out why.
Alright, so test errors didn't suggest any issues with this library. Tests were running mvn
commands and checking different things being included in the output, however, the log file where the output was being saved (passed through the -l
parameter to mvn
) sometimes was not getting generated for some reason (my guess is some issue with mvn
itself).
Since passing -l
or using the CatchStdout
class that would change $stdout
and $stderr
were being used inconsistently, I switched both to a more standard approach of using minitest
methods capture_subprocess_io
or capture_io
and now everything is green 🎉.
@headius With the changes in this PR, there should no longer be any issues when releasing version 3.3.13. Let me know!
Thanks so much for the footwork here, @deivid-rodriguez! I will merge this.
@mkristian Are you still out there? We still are willing to help take over maintenance if we can get a tour and all the appropriate push rights.
@headius I am still out there and did help @deivid-rodriguez as much I could the recent weeks. but we also can schedule some meeting so I give you guys some tour !
Thanks @headius and @mkristian!
@headius You are an owner of this gem as per https://rubygems.org/gems/ruby-maven, so you should be all good for releasing. I don't think releasing this gem needs anything to be pushed to maven servers, in case you're lacking some push rights there.
Avoid using method deprecated in recent bundler versions.
I also added MacOS to the CI because I can't reproduce the CI issues locally and I'm using MacOS, so I want to double check whether it could be related to the OS somehow.