Open 12wrigja opened 1 year ago
Is the difference that the passing ones are calling toLocaleString with no arguments, while the failing ones are calling with these arguments?
instance.toLocaleString(undefined, { calendar: "iso8601" })
It may be that Node 14 didn't support the calendar
option, so it's failing with a RangeError before the uncallable thing is called?
So it's not like these tests run without exceptions in any case. It's only that the ones with a calendar
option fail in an unexpected way (RangeError) on Node 14, while the ones without a calendar
option fail in an expected way (TypeError).
Anyway, I think it's OK to just put the failing tests into the expected-failures-before-node16.txt
and leave the passing tests (the ones that fail with the expected TypeError) out of that file.
While debugging CI failures in #210 , it seems that only some of the test262 cases for
toLocaleString/timezone-getoffsetnanosecondsfor-not-callable.js
fail, and some pass:Passing: PlainTime PlainDate PlainDateTime
Failing: PlainYearMonth PlainMonthDay DateTimeFormat/prototype/format DateTimeFormat/prototype/formatToParts DateTimeFormat/prototype/formatRange DateTimeFormat/prototype/formatRangeToParts
I haven't looked at all the testcases but given they are likely all very similarly structured I'm wondering this is indicative of a bug somewhere?
Failing that, it would be nice to improve the documentation to explain why those tests fail on Node<16 more clearly.