Parse / TryParse

[M-Zuber]

The addition of such functionality would add a lot to this package

[M-Zuber]

I hope to have a PR ready soon

[jsakamoto]

Thank you for your pull request #6 :)

I think, adding TryParse static method is a good idea. But adding Parse static method would cause confusing among the library users, dosen't it?

"What difference does new IPAddressRange(...) and IPAddressRange.Parse(...)?"

Could you tell me your opinion about needs of Parse method?

[M-Zuber]

The reason I feel to add a Parse method is more due to convention. I see it is being the second half of a pair together with TryParse. I have no problem removing it though.

[jsakamoto]

Thank you for your reply.

I see it is being the second half of a pair together with TryParse.

I'll drink to that.

Well, I would like to consider well to obsoloete public constructor instead of adding Parse static method. (That means I'll conceal the constructor to private access control.)

Please give me some time to work :)

[M-Zuber]

:+1: Take you time

[jsakamoto]

Thank you for waiting.

I merged it and publish new package v.1.2!
http://www.nuget.org/packages/IPAddressRange/

Thank you for your suggestion. :smile:

[M-Zuber]

Pleasure!