Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
It looks like it shouldn't be too hard to do, however, the question is how
useful it would be in general. I'm not familiar with the format - under which
circumstances would a user encounter it?
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2011 at 11:35
I regularly receive these attachments from outlook users... I've tried to guide
colleagues away from sending in this format, but it seems that there are
several conditions which may trigger their generation (rather than attachments
being sent transparently with the email). Wikipedia mentions choosing RTF as
the email format, and certain security conditions as triggers.
given that i trust theunarchiver to handle all my archives, it would mean a lot
to me to have this annoying, recalcitrant format handled as part of my normal
workflow.
there are a few apps out there which handle tnef files (i use TNEF's enough),
but it requires launching, then opening the file, then selecting and saving the
contents one-by-one!!
thanks so much for the quick reply, and thanks for an awesome app - its been
invisibly taking care of business for years, now!
Regards, Tim, Melbourne
Original comment by tim.veri...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2011 at 3:11
If it helps, this commonly happens when receiving attachments from people who
are using Outlook and have it set to produce "rich text" email messages rather
than "HTML." It's not too much of a problem "in the wild," as most people don't
use Outlook for their personal email, but it can be a problem when receiving
email from companies where the issue of having Outlook misconfigured is
company-wide.
The right course of action, of course, would be to email back saying that you
can't open the attachment and ask the person to configure their client right or
call their company's help desk to fix it for them, but that's not always an
option...
Original comment by miguelpontes
on 1 Jun 2011 at 3:49
Forgot to link this, there's more info than you could possibly ever want about
this subject in this Mozilla Mail/Thunderbird bug that is still open 10 years
later:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77811
Original comment by miguelpontes
on 1 Jun 2011 at 3:53
Well, I guess I will at least have a look to see how complicated it would be,
and if it's worth it, when I get back to adding some more formats.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2011 at 6:57
Wicked, thanks again
Original comment by tim.veri...@gmail.com
on 2 Jun 2011 at 12:27
Can I please Bump this feature. :)
Original comment by georg...@thoughtified.com
on 25 Jul 2011 at 10:43
My suggestion: Use the code from http://sourceforge.net/projects/tnef/
Original comment by Mento...@gmail.com
on 8 Aug 2012 at 9:22
Unfortunately, it is GPL, therefore unusable.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 8 Aug 2012 at 10:48
The Unarchiver is also under GPL. What’s the problem?
When GPL is a really problem, you can add the tnef binary and call it from your
code.
Original comment by Mento...@gmail.com
on 10 Aug 2012 at 4:10
The Unarchiver is LGPL, not GPL. And due to the design of XADMaster and the
fact that it runs on many operating systems under various configurations,
external binaries are really not an option.
Original comment by paracel...@gmail.com
on 10 Aug 2012 at 4:29
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
tim.veri...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2011 at 7:21Attachments: