Open eps1lon opened 4 years ago
Merging #112 into master will decrease coverage by
0.31%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #112 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 37.39% 37.07% -0.32%
==========================================
Files 87 87
Lines 1182 1176 -6
Branches 227 225 -2
==========================================
- Hits 442 436 -6
Misses 633 633
Partials 107 107
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
lib/allWebkitProperties.js | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
lib/parsers.js | 80.35% <0%> (-0.3%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 62b3b1b...c01df24. Read the comment docs.
@eps1lon is this a regression we missed in the last PR that ended up being 2.2.0 - or new functionality?
@eps1lon is this a regression we missed in the last PR that ended up being 2.2.0 - or new functionality?
Tried the tests in 2.1.0 (git checkout v2.1.0
) and they were failing as well. I couldn't find any tests related to webkit properties. I can try to create some tests related to webkit properties that are passing in 2.1.0.
Only webkit properties are in the spec; other engine prefixes should not be added.
Only webkit properties are in the spec; other engine prefixes should not be added.
This statement clashes with
@jsakas Is there anything I can do to get this merged?
@eps1lon sorry for the delay here. Are you able to resolve the conflict for me? Also, based on @domenic's comment I think only webkit should be supported at this time.
Are you able to resolve the conflict for me?
Sure thing.
Also, based on @domenic's comment I think only webkit should be supported at this time.
Personally I would prefer if this also handled other prefixed properties. This is in line with https://github.com/jsdom/cssstyle/blob/ebd2dab41a3396419513a7698cdd37494727d0da/lib/allExtraProperties.js#L4-L5
But I understand if you want to change that stance to "we only support properties in the spec".
Hi @eps1lon, do you intend to fix conflict for this pull request? I encounter an error with a webkit CSS property not being recognized correctly, and this issue should fix it. I you're not willing to do it, I'll be happy to do it.
What I also noticed is that webkit specific value are accessible through 2 names:
webkitTextFillColor and WebkitTextFillColor
I'm currently not sure if this PR will implement both of them (test case looks like it is)
BTW allProperties define only 1 webkit property alone, -webkit-line-clamp
I think this PR should remove this line, introduced lately on January
Not working on this one at the moment
Seems like they were never tested. I'm not sure if the two added tests can be fixed with independent commits.