jselbie / stunserver

Version 1.2. This is the source code to STUNTMAN - an open source STUN server and client code by john selbie. Compliant with the latest RFCs including 5389, 5769, and 5780. Also includes backwards compatibility for RFC 3489. Compiles on Linux, MacOS, BSD, Solaris, and Win32 with Cygwin. Windows binaries avaialble from www.stunprotocol.org.
http://www.stunprotocol.org
Apache License 2.0
1.44k stars 349 forks source link

Migration to GitHub is not complete #52

Closed Neustradamus closed 1 year ago

Neustradamus commented 1 year ago

Dear @jselbie,

It will be nice to remove old parts like:

Can you add a "move" box like https://sourceforge.net/projects/handbrake for example.

To disable/delete tabs, go here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/stuntman/ To add a new tab, go here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/stuntman/ To change informations, go here: https://sourceforge.net/p/stuntman/admin/overview To export, go here: https://sourceforge.net/p/stuntman/admin/export

The new place can be added in:

Thanks in advance.

jselbie commented 1 year ago

@Neustradamus - let me clarify what I meant. I realize I came across as curt in one of my earlier responses.

First, are you a bot?

In the last few days you've resurrected a handful of issues and threads that I have not felt important enough to pursue. Commitment to tagging and migrating away from Sourceforge are very low on my priority list right now.

I would like the next refresh of the code base will be in these areas:

But all of this is on the backburner right now. Maybe later this year, I will have time to return to improving the code.

I continue to support this code by making sure that it can still build and run on modern Linux/Unix systems with minimal effort. (e.g. type "make"). If there's ever an issue such that the code doesn't build, deploy, and run, I would bend over backwards to help someone with such an issue.

Neustradamus commented 1 year ago

@jselbie: Thanks for your answer! You are not the first guy like curt badly but the first one who has the honesty to explain himself.

Why a bot? I have already spoken with you previously no?

I really appreciate your response, thanks for your details, hope you can improve the code, and maybe you can look Meson too.