Closed jonathanong closed 10 years ago
@tweettypography put together this:
@tweettypography is that using the same font?
Would need to be transparent background and square, I think.
Source files are here: https://github.com/tweettypography/logo.js/tree/master/jshttp
Would need to be transparent background
it's transparent indeed :) using whatever font from the JSConf logo.
Oh, I see what you're saying @Fishrock123 . Yes, @tweettypography I see now is that GitHub only takes square logos for the orgs, so I guess we'll want to see if we can get some square form as well, haha
Sure thing @dougwilson @Fishrock123. Does this work? https://github.com/tweettypography/logo.js/blob/master/jshttp/jshttp-square.png
LGTM!
We'll make sure to thank you in the readme (& site if we use it on it) once we get that far. :)
suuuuuweeeetttt
this logo looks too similar to jshint...
this logo looks too similar to jshint...
it's mostly the same, yes :) was that a good thing to you or a bad thing?
Well it sounds like a bad thing, because those are completely unrelated. But I can't suggest anything better anyway.
I wouldn't worry too much about it; the words Hint
and http
look different enough that people won't confuse them. The only part that looks similar is JS
, which is kind of the point I guess. Here's their logo taken from their site for comparison.
They probably changed it then. I still remember old one:
PS: I'm trying to fit the logo on the dark background, any ideas about that?
@tweettypography is the one that made the logo. I'd suggest making the dark background light though, it probably feels cleaner as a result too.
trying to add it to website, see http://rlidwka.github.io/jshttp.github.io/logo.html , please check that out.
How about lighting things up? light
dark
Yes, @rlidwka, the similarity to jshint is somewhat intentional - both logos are extending the well-known js logo in a fairly conventional way so they will look similar. But standardization on the use of that mark isn't a bad thing. If the intent is to look truly different it might be better not to use the js mark at all.. which isn't really up to me.
Ps. I agree with @yoshuawuyts about lightening things up. Looks fresh
I agree with @yoshuawuyts about lightening things up. Looks fresh
Too much contrast with badges imho (and we can't really control their color).
I like the lightened version tbh.
Is there an easy way to ping the badge server for the status? That would be the greatest.
Is there an easy way to ping the badge server for the status?
do you mean, get the raw data that they use to make the badges?
Aye, in that way you can create a cleaner dashboard, rather than one littered with badges.
But that's just for experimentation's sake. :)
Aye
ah, in that case, you can see the apis they pull from here: https://github.com/badges/shields/blob/master/server.js
Ooh, that's pretty sweet.
Too much contrast with badges imho (and we can't really control their color).
Does this help with the dark background? https://github.com/tweettypography/logo.js/blob/master/jshttp/jshttp-dark.png
yeah, that would work
Looking at node.js logo... maybe we could steal some ideas from there:
maybe. idk. seeing as their logo is trademarked, having one too similar (especially having the literally same "JS" in there) is probably asking for trouble
@rlidwka Could you explain the issues you have with logo proposed here?
@yoshuawuyts , well we need something to choose from, right?
i don't want to ahve any inspirations from joyent haha
nobody likes joyent... I see :)
since we have a logo, i'm going to close this. but if you have a better suggestion, open a new issue!
Whipped up one quickly, let me know if you like it.