Closed mennodeij closed 4 years ago
@mennodeij TIOGA iblank has three states
IBLANK = 1
IBLANK = -1
, and IBLANK = 0
See the following image.
Your second question doesn't make sense to me. You'll have to tell TIOGA some information about the meshes that you're sending it... specifically you'll have to give it information on the wall boundaries (so that it can identify hole nodes) and overset boundaries (so that it can tag those nodes in the foreground mesh that you mentioned) as mandatory fringes. If you just give it two meshes, with similar cell resolutions then it doesn't really have a good criteria to pick one vs. the other and the results might not be what you expect.
Another thing I would point out is that TIOGA doesn't cut a hole in the background mesh by default. It will tag all the cells that lie inside another mesh (with a smaller cell resolution) as receptors and tag them with IBLANK = -1
. There is an option reduce_fringes
that you can use to detect this and minimize the number of receptor nodes and deactivate the remaining cells that are entirely surrounded by fringe/hole.
Indeed, I’m giving node tags to the boundary of the overset mesh (obcnode) and to the wall (wbcnode) using arrays in the two tioga_registergrid_data_mb calls, one for the foreground and one for the background grid.
Thanks for pointing out the hole cutting behaviour for the background grid, that is probably why I don’t see any iblank=0 values.
Ok, it is clear to me now how this works and that reduce_fringes
is used to cut holes.
I'm testing tioga with a 3D overset grid assembly in which one grid ('foreground') is completely within another grid ('background'). I have a couple of questions about this.