Open dorshmil opened 8 months ago
That gerund case requires that one side of the gerund is empty. The form cannot be used for & because that would conflict with the u&n definition.
Henry Rich
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 4:26 AM shmil @.***> wrote:
this format already implemented for the case of: u&.(+`-) and it will make sense that & and &: behave the same way
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/issues/185, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEKVAJ75WIMYBAW22SJFPM3YYAET7AVCNFSM6AAAAABETVW7BSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGE4DGMZZGE3DEMY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
this format already implemented for the case of: u&.(+`-) and it will make sense that & and &: behave the same way