This would allow overtake on a boxed array to supply the fill (boxed) element suitable for further processing.
In dictionary format -
Fit(Customize) u !. v
The case of !. with a verb right argument is defined in terms of the noun right
argument case (u !. n) as follows:
x u !. v y <--> x u!.(x v y) y
u !. v y <--> u!.( v y) y
and
Fit(Customize) u !. n
This conjunction modifies certain verbs in ways prescribed in their definitions.
Case n is not a gerund, ...(same as current definition )
Case n is a gerund. (Compare with the gerund cases of the merge adverb } and power conjunction ^: )
x u!.(v0`v1`v2) y <--> (x v0 y) u!.(x v1 y) (x v2 y)
x u!.( v1`v2) y <--> x u!.([`v1`v2) y
u!.( v1`v2) y <--> u!.(v1 y) (v2 y)
Because a gerund is a boxed noun there may be an issue with the second case. It may be the case that a gerund may be a valid fill (or other customisation) element so that fit evoking the gerund would not be possible.
However having a verb right argument for the fit conjunction seems possible. The verb could inspect both x and y to determine an appropriate fill element.
This would allow overtake on a boxed array to supply the fill (boxed) element suitable for further processing.
In dictionary format -
and
Because a gerund is a boxed noun there may be an issue with the second case. It may be the case that a gerund may be a valid fill (or other customisation) element so that fit evoking the gerund would not be possible.
However having a verb right argument for the fit conjunction seems possible. The verb could inspect both x and y to determine an appropriate fill element.
-- Ian Shannon <2010-07-28T09:36:30Z>