Closed ghurlbot closed 2 years ago
This action was created in today's meeting.
cc/ @rob-metalinkage
@rob-metalinkage: any update on this action to report for tomorrow's meeting?
Having looked at the draft yaml-ld spec I have created an initial PR
https://github.com/json-ld/yaml-ld/pull/70
I think we first need to decide how we introduce this (i.e. do we need a separate specification document or is this sufficient) - then we can look at listing the syntactical elements supported by JSON-LD. - can the WG decide where and how this should be included and if it needs further explanation - or just delegation to the relevant experts to fill in the details?
We shouldn’t need any extra documents to do this, and fundamentally need to decide what is compatible, and if something incompatible is even in scope.
I'm calling this action complete, as https://github.com/json-ld/yaml-ld/pull/70 has been created. Thanks @rob-metalinkage.
due 27 Jul 2022 (@rob-metalinkage)