Open pchampin opened 3 weeks ago
In fact, this behavior does not conform to the spec. See the Context Processing Algorithm:
5.2.5.2) If the document has no top-level map with an @context entry, an invalid remote context has been detected and processing is aborted.
An easy mistake for context publisher is to forget to wrap their context in
{ "@context": ... }
. See for example https://openprovenance.org/prov-jsonld/2020-03-23/context.json (yes, this context has other issue, but that's not relevant to my point here).Unfortunately, the JSON-LD Playground does not report any error when asked to use that context. It just silently ignores it.
I guess the rationale was that the absence of
@context
was equivalent to an empty@context
, but I would argue that the absence of@context
in a resource that is explicitly used as a context is very likely to be an error instead, and should be reported.By the way, that's other JSON-LD implementations (@gkellogg's or @timothee-haudebourg's) do.
Example in the playground where the invalid context is silently ignored.