Closed gkellogg closed 1 year ago
@gkellogg good catch! I'd use "anchor names" when referring to the names (e.g. wrt that names are a serialization detail) and "node anchors" in other cases. Fixed in yaml too https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/mediatypes/pull/61
@gkellogg good catch! I'd use "anchor names" when referring to the names (e.g. wrt that names are a serialization detail) and "node anchors" in other cases. Fixed in yaml too ietf-wg-httpapi/mediatypes#61
Note that "anchor names" aren't actually a defined term in YAML, but an artifact of a "node anchor". Without defining a term for it, the language probably needs to be revised a bit more.
I went ahead and made both "anchor name" and "anchored node" aliases for "node anchor" and updated text to read more closely to that from YAML.
as "named anchor" isn't something actually defined in YAML.
Preview | Diff