Closed Relequestual closed 2 years ago
Both choices fit and don't fit the situation with hyper-schema development. I think "inactive" is the least bad choice.
However, this repo is empty and doesn't actually have anything to do with hyper-schema development. So, maybe "concept" is more appropriate in this situation.
Concept - Minimal or no implementation has been done yet, or the repository is only intended to be a limited example, demo, or proof-of-concept.
This repo is intended to one day be the place hyper-schema development will happen, but for now, it's an empty placeholder repo.
... However, this repo is empty and doesn't actually have anything to do with hyper-schema development. So, maybe "concept" is more appropriate in this situation.
This repo is intended to one day be the place hyper-schema development will happen, but for now, it's an empty placeholder repo.
I hadn't even clocked that fact. Good call. Thanks.
this repo is empty and doesn't actually have anything to do with hyper-schema development. - @jdesrosiers
Do you feel splitting into its own repo still makes sense?
When you're able to pick up Hyper Schema work again, do you see a path to transition the spec to this repo?
Do you feel splitting into its own repo still makes sense?
When you're able to pick up Hyper Schema work again, do you see a path to transition the spec to this repo?
Yes, I think that's the best approach. Hyper-schema is just a vocabulary. It can be developed, maintained, released, etc independently from core/validation.
This seems reasonable to me too, and given it seems the two of you agreed at the end I'll hit the button?
But beyond the badge I don't think it's obvious enough that this repo is empty from the README alone, even after this badge -- I'm going to additionally add that to the sidebar description, where it's a bit more upfront. Obviously if anyone disagrees speak up.
EDIT: (Done, the language I used was "A future location for <existing text>
". Comments again welcome if there's an improvement.)
I've been adding "repo status" aka https://repostatus.org badges to our repos, and with this one, I figured others may have opinions, specifically @jdesrosiers =]
Do you feel "Inactive" is OK for now?
Although we might think suspended is a better word, the definition isn't as good a fit, IMHO.
Open to alternative suggestions too.