Closed SethFalco closed 1 year ago
Various references for this.
MMMMM YYYY
or MMM. YYYY
MM/YYYY
or MMM YYYY
MM/YYYY
or MMMMM YYYY
Workable advise specifying DD so that ATS systems can clearly see it's a date. However, most other sources don't offer the same advice, and some even discourage it as too much unnecessary information.
I'd prefer to avoid DD/MM/YYYY or MM/DD/YYYY as in most cases these are ambiguous anyway.
For now, I'll settle on MMM YYYY as I think it looks nicer.
While we're at it, let's also wrap dates in a time
element and add the associated datetime
attribute.
Seeing all the numbers together like that seems a bit cluttered. Instead we should use display month names or at least the abbreviated form?