Closed stephenmell closed 3 years ago
Thank you very much for the pull request! The implementation looks great. ✨
Any chance you would be willing to add a quick unit test, so that we can be sure this works now and into the future? :pray:
Sorry for the delay. I've added a unit test which fails without the change and succeeds with it.
I just noticed the comment about how this project isn't actively maintained, which is a shame, since I've found it very useful. Do you expect to still be merging pull requests, or are you looking to hand it off?
Thanks for the test! :bow:
I just noticed the comment about how this project isn't actively maintained, which is a shame, since I've found it very useful. Do you expect to still be merging pull requests, or are you looking to hand it off?
I am still reviewing and merging pull requests (though not always very promptly). The main reason I'm not more active with the project is that I'm not working on anything where I'm actually using it.
I'm happy to direct people to a more active fork, if there is or would be one. 🤷
This adds an implementation of hash, fixing bug #32. The hash is that of the pair containing _key and _value.