jstjohn / KentLib

Subset of the kent source libraries (perhaps out of date) that are easily built and installed on OSX and Linux. These libraries provide usefull utilities for bioinformatics programming in C. This may contain some of my own libraries for bioinformatics utilities as well as long as they install easily on both my mac and linux box.
13 stars 3 forks source link

Four files do contain old licensing statement #2

Open tillea opened 8 years ago

tillea commented 8 years ago

Hi,

since the README file contains a free license there are four remaining files featuring the old licensing statement: * Copyright (C) 2000 Jim Kent. This source code may be freely used * * for personal, academic, and non-profit purposes. Commercial use * * permitted only by explicit agreement with Jim Kent (jim_kent@pacbell.net) * These files are

  1. inc/cheapcgi.h
  2. inc/hmmstats.h
  3. inc/portimpl.h
  4. inc/sig.h

While I assume this might be by accident and not really intended fixing this would be important to clarify the bug reported to the Debian package r-cran-rtracklayer which is using this code. It would be great if you could fix the license text inside these files.

Kind regards

     Andreas.
jstjohn commented 8 years ago

Hi Andreas, this issue should be taken up directly with Jim Kent. If he gives the OK I am more than happy to update those problematic headers. This is not my code, so I am not sure what was intended between the conflicting statement in the README that was part of the Kent source tree at the time, and header comments in the individual libraries you mentioned.

tillea commented 8 years ago

Hi Jim,

you probably remember my constant nagging abou the licensing of your library code. Inside the bug report in Debian BTS[1] you mentioned MPL yourself. Since I did not received any definitive answer stronger than

"looking at Mozilla Public LIcense, ... I can release it under that as well."

I was searching the web for potential new releases of the code. I found something at Github which has only four files left with a non-free license and I mentioned this in the according bug report there[2]. From what I can see when inspecting the whole directory it looks pretty much like an unwanted leftover since all other files have later copyright and a free license.

It would be really great if you could clarify this.

Thanks a lot for your cooperation

    Andreas.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807580#112 [2] https://github.com/jstjohn/KentLib/issues/2

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:56:16AM -0700, John St. John wrote:

Hi Andreas, this issue should be taken up directly with Jim Kent. If he gives the OK I am more than happy to update those problematic headers. This is not my code, so I am not sure what was intended between the conflicting statement in the README that was part of the Kent source tree at the time, and header comments in the individual libraries you mentioned.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jstjohn/KentLib/issues/2#issuecomment-217906316

http://fam-tille.de

tillea commented 8 years ago

Hmm, the license statements are like so on these 4:

/* hmmstats.h - Stuff for doing statistical analysis in general and

not what is in the github note:

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Andreas Tille tille@debian.org wrote:

Hi Jim,

you probably remember my constant nagging abou the licensing of your library code. Inside the bug report in Debian BTS[1] you mentioned MPL yourself. Since I did not received any definitive answer stronger than

"looking at Mozilla Public LIcense, ... I can release it under that as well."

I was searching the web for potential new releases of the code. I found something at Github which has only four files left with a non-free license and I mentioned this in the according bug report there[2]. From what I can see when inspecting the whole directory it looks pretty much like an unwanted leftover since all other files have later copyright and a free license.

It would be really great if you could clarify this.

Thanks a lot for your cooperation

    Andreas.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807580#112 [2] https://github.com/jstjohn/KentLib/issues/2

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:56:16AM -0700, John St. John wrote:

Hi Andreas, this issue should be taken up directly with Jim Kent. If he gives the OK I am more than happy to update those problematic headers. This is not my code, so I am not sure what was intended between the conflicting statement in the README that was part of the Kent source tree at the time, and header comments in the individual libraries you mentioned.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jstjohn/KentLib/issues/2#issuecomment-217906316

http://fam-tille.de

tillea commented 8 years ago

Hi Jim,

thanks for the clarification. Do you maintain somewhere some official repository where we could fetch these files from. I assumed Github would be official ...

Thanks for your quick and helpful response

   Andreas.

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 05:32:33PM -0700, Jim Kent wrote:

Hmm, the license statements are like so on these 4:

/* hmmstats.h - Stuff for doing statistical analysis in general and

  • hidden Markov models in particular.

    *

  • This file is copyright 2000 Jim Kent, but license is hereby
  • granted for all use - public, private or commercial. */

not what is in the github note:

  • Copyright (C) 2000 Jim Kent. This source code may be freely used *
  • for personal, academic, and non-profit purposes. Commercial use *
  • permitted only by explicit agreement with Jim Kent (jim_kent@pacbell.net) *

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Andreas Tille tille@debian.org wrote:

Hi Jim,

you probably remember my constant nagging abou the licensing of your library code. Inside the bug report in Debian BTS[1] you mentioned MPL yourself. Since I did not received any definitive answer stronger than

"looking at Mozilla Public LIcense, ... I can release it under that as well."

I was searching the web for potential new releases of the code. I found something at Github which has only four files left with a non-free license and I mentioned this in the according bug report there[2]. From what I can see when inspecting the whole directory it looks pretty much like an unwanted leftover since all other files have later copyright and a free license.

It would be really great if you could clarify this.

Thanks a lot for your cooperation

    Andreas.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807580#112 [2] https://github.com/jstjohn/KentLib/issues/2

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:56:16AM -0700, John St. John wrote:

Hi Andreas, this issue should be taken up directly with Jim Kent. If he gives the OK I am more than happy to update those problematic headers. This is not my code, so I am not sure what was intended between the conflicting statement in the README that was part of the Kent source tree at the time, and header comments in the individual libraries you mentioned.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jstjohn/KentLib/issues/2#issuecomment-217906316

http://fam-tille.de

http://fam-tille.de