Open qilip opened 3 years ago
Hey @qilip, thanks for taking the time to document this! Truthfully, I have no idea why this would be happening. But thanks for taking the time to research other issues before posting.
Out of curiosity, if you run the following query in the GitHub GraphQL API Explorer, does it show github/copilot-preview
? If so, you can add and remove values from the contributionTypes
list to figure out why it is there.
{
viewer {
login
name
repositories(first: 100) {
nodes {
nameWithOwner
}
}
repositoriesContributedTo(
first: 100,
includeUserRepositories: false,
contributionTypes: [
COMMIT,
PULL_REQUEST,
REPOSITORY,
PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW
]
) {
nodes {
nameWithOwner
}
}
}
}
When I ran that query, the github/copilot-preview
repository only existed in repositories
(first query).
In the case of , it seems to be visible only as a result of the first query, not in the second query.
I'm not sure if the above expression is correct. Below is a summary of the query results.
(I did not change the contributionTypes
because I can't see the github/copilot-preview
repo in the second query even though I put all contributionTypes
.)
{
"data": {
"viewer": {
"login": "qilip",
"name": "SangMin Shin",
"repositories": {
"nodes": [
{
"nameWithOwner": A // personal repos I own
},
{
"nameWithOwner": B // other's private repo, have access but no contributions
},
{
"nameWithOwner": C // other's private repo, have access and last contribution 2020.04.xx
},
{
"nameWithOwner": D // other's private repo, have access and last contribution 2021.09.xx
},
{
"nameWithOwner": E // other's private repo, have access and last contribution 2021.06.xx
},
{
"nameWithOwner": "github/copilot-preview" // private, no contribution
},
]
},
"repositoriesContributedTo": {
"nodes": [
{
"nameWithOwner": F // organization repo (I'm one of owners) last contribution 2020.11.xx
},
{
"nameWithOwner": D // other's private repo, have access and last contribution 2021.09.xx
},
{
"nameWithOwner": E // other's private repo, have access and last contribution 2021.06.xx
}
]
}
}
}
}
Huh, that's quite unexpected. I guess maybe you were added to the repo somehow? I tend to doubt there is much I can do about this case, but I'll leave the issue open in case others have the same problem.
Thanks for documenting this and indulging my curiosity!
My guess is that the star of the private repo with the permissions is included.
However, most private repos don't have or have few stars, so this shouldn't be a problem.
It seems that users who participated in the copilot preview may experience the same problem. (If you participate in the copilot preview, you get github/copilot-preview
permission.)
Thank you for your help!
Hi!
I found this repo a while ago and am trying it out. Most of it works fine 👍, but there was a problem with my Star count being excessively high. (
EXCLUDE_FORKED_REPOS
option istrue
)Referring to issue #18 , when I ran it locally, the copilot repo(github/copilot-preview) was included in the statistics.
I added this to
EXCLUDED
and it now looks fine. I haven't contributed to the copilot repo, but it seems to be included as part of a private repo. (maybe?🤔)I'm not sure if it's a bug or not. However, I'm leaving this as an issue as there may be other users who may have the same problem.
Thanks for making a nice project!