regression: artifact-note on after toggle-off

[Levitanus]

https://youtu.be/-jmNjwkqnLM after toggle-off the articulation invokes not only note-off msg, but also the same note-on Reaper 5.984 Reaticulate 0.3.92 xubuntu 19.04 JS_Rescript extension is installed

[jtackaberry]

Can you please share the reabank used here? This looks like correct behavior for note-hold output events, so I'm guessing you've got a different spec?

[Levitanus]

//! g="Bolder" n="Upright Bass"
Bank 05 1 Bolder - Upright Bass
//! c=long i=marcato o=note-hold:37 transpose=12
01 pick
//! c=long i=marcato-quarter o=note-hold:38 transpose=12
02 short attack
//! c=long i=staccato-dig o=note-hold:39 transpose=12
03 slap
//! c=long-light i=harmonics o=note-hold:40 transpose=12
04 harmonics

This looks like correct behavior

Mmm, how to reorganize bank for make it not send the next note-on? )

P.S. I'm not sure I've had such problem before. But can not test previous banks right now, just moved to the new setup

[jtackaberry]

note-hold simulates holding the note while the articulation is active. When you click onto a different articulation, it releases the note held by the previous articulation. If you switch from 1 note-hold articulation to another, it will send the note-off for the previous one and send the note-on for the current one. This looks to me exactly what it's doing, and that behavior is consistent with the last 0.3.x stable release as well.

Mmm, how to reorganize bank for make it not send the next note-on?

I'm not sure what you mean. Will just a note output event type work? This sends note-on and note-off immediately.

[Levitanus]

For example with this articulation:

//! c=long i=marcato o=note-hold:37 transpose=12
01 pick

at the fisrt press note-on (37) msg will be sent at the second press note-off (37) msg, then note-on (37) msg will be sent.

I think this is how things are now and how they wasn't before :)

[jtackaberry]

I think this is how things are now and how they wasn't before :)

That was the old behavior too. I just tested it.

And to me it makes sense. Retriggering the articulation should retrigger the underlying keyswitch. If you didn't want that, why insert the second program change?

[Levitanus]

Agreed. can be closed, thanks

[jtackaberry]

Thanks Timofey.