Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Hi Maxim,
Thanks for your report. However, I am not fully convinced yet that this is a
good idea in terms of maintainability and JAR-hell. Ideally each plugin should
be fully self-contained, exposing only "lightweight" interfaces (i.e., small
interfaces with only JRE default classes).
However, should it be implemented, the "codeword" you proposed (and
alternatively an option for addPluginsFrom()) would probably be the solution of
choice.
Give me some time to consider this issue, it is also closely related to Issue
#18.
Kind regards
Ralf
Original comment by r.biedert
on 23 Sep 2010 at 8:57
Hi Ralf,
I understand this feature will require some changes in framework architecture,
so eventually it will come to something like OSGI monster.
I will think how such issues can be solved not twisting current framework.
Thanks,
Maxim
Original comment by McSe...@gmail.com
on 23 Sep 2010 at 9:38
Hopefully fixed (please get 0.9.1a from the downloads and test!). Also see
http://code.google.com/p/jspf/wiki/FAQ -> Multiplugins.
Original comment by r.biedert
on 23 Sep 2010 at 3:42
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
McSe...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2010 at 9:09