Closed jeromyanglim closed 10 years ago
Awesome, thanks! Think you could update with a pull request correcting the problem and adding yourself to the list of contributors at the end of the document?
Hi Jeff,
Thanks again.
I've never done a pull request before. So that was good practice. Hopefully it worked.
cheers, Jeromy
... Dr Jeromy Anglim Lecturer in Research Methods School of Psychology, Deakin University website: http://jeromyanglim.blogspot.com
From: "Jeff L." notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> Reply-To: jtleek/rpackages reply@reply.github.com<mailto:reply@reply.github.com> Date: Tuesday, 15 October 2013 11:06 AM To: jtleek/rpackages rpackages@noreply.github.com<mailto:rpackages@noreply.github.com> Cc: Jeromy Anglim jkanglim@gmail.com<mailto:jkanglim@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [rpackages] Should test-all.R be in tests rather than inst/tests ? (#9)
Awesome, thanks! Think you could update with a pull request correcting the problem and adding yourself to the list of contributors at the end of the document?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jtleek/rpackages/issues/9#issuecomment-26299107.
Important Notice: The contents of this email are intended solely for the named addressee and are confidential; any unauthorised use, reproduction or storage of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and any attachments immediately and advise the sender by return email or telephone.
Deakin University does not warrant that this email and any attachments are error or virus free.
Thanks for the awesome package writing guide. You suggest
However, I noticed that this wasn't automatically running the tests when I ran
R CMD CHECK
in RStudio. I noticed that Hadley puts run-all.R intests
(e.g., stringr and puts the actual tests ininst/tests
). When I did that, I had automated tests withR CMD CHECK
.