Bug: Second character of macro disappears when it is used in chord

[nanikamado]

Requirements

• [X] I've searched platform-specific issues, issues and discussions to see if this has been reported before.

Describe the bug

The second character of macro disappears in certain conditions.

Relevant kanata config

(defsrc a b o)
(deflayer default
  (chord base a)
  (chord base b)
  (chord base o)
)
(defchords base 500
  (a) (macro a z)
  (b) (macro b)
  (o) o
  (a o) o
)

To Reproduce

The inputs and outputs are like this: https://jtroo.github.io?data=BQEwpgZgzgTgxgAgIYIEYIPYEoBQpIA2SAnmDAuBEgK4EAuOCCwcAFhjCGklGMrkxbtO3XmgHM2HLqh59sOXPghTOUUXwCsABm2NmSLMwC2SODAzIEALwnBUR4KfOWH+4NkzuUnjIoA+gUHBIf4gAFwA0mDEAIIIdOEAjLoUUTEAQgnJqdTpxFmJKXp50XHZAJy62kA

Expected behavior

The expected outputs would be something like this:

t:              100ms
out:   ↓(press) A
t:              1ms
out: ↑(release) A
t:              1ms
out:   ↓(press) Z
t:              1ms
out: ↑(release) Z
t:              1ms
out:   ↓(press) B
t:              1ms
out: ↑(release) B

Kanata version

kanata 1.7.0-prerelease-1

Debug logs

No response

Operating system

Linux

Additional context

No response

[jtroo]

Do debug logs show the second character being outputted? Perhaps your environment needs a delay due to events getting too rapid?

[nanikamado]

The second character is not being outputted also in the simulator, so I believe my environment is not relevant.

[jtroo]

I would guess the issue is not chord but instead simultaneously running macros

Potential workaround: https://jtroo.github.io?data=BQEwpgZgzgTgxgAgIYIEYIPYEoBQpIA2SAnmDAuBEgK4EAuOCCwcAFhjCGklGMrkxbtO3XmgHM2HLqh59sOXPghTOUUXwCsABm2NmSLMwC2tOgEtkCAF4TgqI6n3BsmZylcZFAH19--Ad4gAFwA0mDEAIIIdMEAjLoUYREAQjHxidTJxGmxCXpZ4VHpAJy62kA

Showcase of adding a delay, probably not a good workaround. https://jtroo.github.io?data=BQEwpgZgzgTgxgAgIYIEYIPYEoBQpIA2SAnmDAuBEgK4EAuOCCwcAFhjCGklGMrkxbtO3XmgHM2HLqh59sOXPghTOUUXwCsABm2NmSLMwC2SODAzIEALwnBUR4KfOWATOP3BsmTym8ZFAB9gkNCwwJAALgBpMGIAQQQ6SIBGXQoYuIAhJNT06kziHOS0vQLYhNyATl1tIA

[nanikamado]

multi worked for my use case. Thank you.

[nanikamado]

Turns out that multi also can not be used for my use case, because the same key can not be repeated with multi.

For example, in this case, the output I want is like ↓A ↓Z ↑A ↑Z ↓Z ↑Z or ↓A ↑A ↓Z ↑Z ↓Z ↑Z.