Closed ohmyohmyohmy closed 2 weeks ago
for complexer forks there is already the newer and more powerfull switch statement
(switch
;; case 1
((and a b (or c d) (or e f))) @ac1 break
;; case 2
(a b c) @ac2 fallthrough
;; case 3
() @ac3 break
)
Huh... I must have missed that in the manual. Thanks!
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I love the idea of the fork. Unfortunately, the fork right now only supports one additional action besides the default action.
Describe the solution you'd like.
I envision the perfect fork as something like this:
Describe alternatives you've considered.
I've tried using multi, creating a dedicated layer when a active key is pressed, but I think a multiple fork would be more elegant.
Additional context
No response