Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
when I have a long running macro m (macro-release-cancel m 300 o ) and I interrupt it by typing say i after 100ms I get miosimulate
But the intention of the macro was to get m or mo not something "random".
Describe the solution you'd like.
A fragil / breakable macro macro-alone could solve this. meaning macro-alone gets cancled when another key gets pressed.
Describe alternatives you've considered.
no good idea
Additional context
I stumbled into this while playing with zippy-chord and trying to add the same chord to the tap and hold action of keys.
I don't believe this would fix my issues here, but I still think canceling macros is the mostly intended and more responsive behaviour.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
when I have a long running macro
m (macro-release-cancel m 300 o )
and I interrupt it by typing sayi
after 100ms I getmio
simulate But the intention of the macro was to getm
ormo
not something "random".Describe the solution you'd like.
A fragil / breakable macro
macro-alone
could solve this. meaningmacro-alone
gets cancled when another key gets pressed.Describe alternatives you've considered.
no good idea
Additional context
I stumbled into this while playing with zippy-chord and trying to add the same chord to the tap and hold action of keys. I don't believe this would fix my issues here, but I still think canceling macros is the mostly intended and more responsive behaviour.