Open juhp opened 2 years ago
Currently cabal-rpm has problems handling Haskell packages that start with "ghc-", since this is the common prefix we use for Haskell packages built with ghc.
An example is the ghc-tags package.
Using a Package type may help to keep better track of Haskell package names, though that may not be sufficient.
Cold cabal spec actually works, but for existing spec file it tries to prune the 'ghc-' prefix and look for such dir.
cabal spec
Currently cabal-rpm has problems handling Haskell packages that start with "ghc-", since this is the common prefix we use for Haskell packages built with ghc.
An example is the ghc-tags package.
Using a Package type may help to keep better track of Haskell package names, though that may not be sufficient.