Open farchord opened 10 months ago
Sorry, the actual syntax should be:
Spec URL:
According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=fedora-review
Thanks for this
I think an example created with fedora-create-review would be helpful (more authoritative).
Because the description is often more than one line (the Summary goes into the RR summary field)
I think an example created with fedora-create-review would be helpful (more authoritative).
Because the description is often more than one line (the Summary goes into the RR summary field)
From experience, if the description is multi-lined, that works fine as far as requesting repos. I'm guessing the "Fedora Account System Username: " line has a certain degree of importance but I don't think there's a restriction as to where it should be.
As long as it's on a line on it's own I mean.
Yeah, anyway i will try to find an example just for reference.
TBH I don't think the FAS-id line is a hard requirement (as in a blocker), but I agree it is good to have and easy enough to do.
This is what gets output by the script:
Spec URL: (URL) SRPM URL: (SRPM URL)
Description: Classes to read and interact with KColorScheme.
This is what the system would usually expect:
Spec URL: (URL) SRPM URL: (SRPM URL) Description: Classes to read and interact with KColorScheme. Fedora Account: farchord
Aside from that, works great!