Open mbruzek opened 7 years ago
This was by design, @urosj are we likely to support doing this?
We are not planning to allow this. Once multi-series, always multi-series. You can make another charm with a different name, or make the charm logic resilient to the different series.
I get hit by this from multiple angles and would emphasize that there are fundamental worries to this, perhaps with also some soft values to the project juju itself.
I've written on this in the discourse: https://discourse.juju.is/t/support-multiple-os-series-in-a-single-charm/3121/6
@kwmonroe and I are trying to help our IBM partners resolve an issue. They have a multi-series charm named 'ibm-im'. They are trying to add some support for 'xenial' only and are not able to push a single series over a multi-series charm. https://jujucharms.com/u/ibmcharmers/ibm-im/
Can you please tell us how to make a multi-series charm single series again?
We tried several different things, such as editing the metadata.yaml with the proper seris and tried to push a single series. Here is the output:
Here is the listing of the charm revisions.
We essentially want to reset this back to 6 and go from there.